Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

2 Subjects

Book Review Paper

Book Review Paper

Q Pay attention to items C1, C2, C3, C4, & C5 in the Rubric for your rough draft. You do not have to go into any detail for C5 but do connect to concepts that we have discussed in BUS 8100. To be clear, you are not referencing the Student Learning Outcomes. You will instead be connecting to the different concepts that you learned in the course. To upload your completed work, click on the Start Assignment button and then the Submit Assignment button. Rubric Book Report Paper (1) Book Report Paper (1) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(Content) C1: Includes an APA style 250 word maximum abstract. 10 to >9.0 pts Meets the criterion 9 to >8.0 pts Falls slightly short of the criterion 8 to >6.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in some aspects 6 to >4.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in most aspects 4 to >0 pts Compeletely unsatisfactory 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeC2: Contains an introduction which provides general information about the topic and provides an overview of the paper. 20 to >18.0 pts Meets the criterian 18 to >16.0 pts Falls slightly short of the criterion 16 to >12.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in some aspects 12 to >6.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in most aspects 6 to >0 pts Completely unsatisfactory 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeC3: Provides an overview of the author’s background, credentials, and any relevant information. 10 to >9.0 pts Meets the criterion 9 to >8.0 pts Falls slightly short of the criterion 8 to >6.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in some aspects 6 to >4.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in most aspects 4 to >0 pts Completely unsatisfactory 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeC4: Demonstrates an understanding about the author’s primary concepts and principles. 30 to >26.0 pts Meets the criterion 26 to >18.0 pts Falls slightly short of the criterion 18 to >12.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in some aspects 12 to >6.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in most aspects 6 to >0 pts Completely unsatisfactory 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeC5: Connects the author’s responses the concepts discussed in BUS8100 (course content in BUS8100). 30 to >26.0 pts Meets the criterion 26 to >18.0 pts Falls slightly short of the criterion 18 to >12.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in some aspects 12 to >6.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in most aspects 6 to >0 pts Completely unsatisfactory 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeC6: Evaluates the relevance of the author’s point of view. 10 to >9.0 pts Meets the criterion 9 to >8.0 pts Falls slightly short of the criterion 8 to >6.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in some aspects 6 to >4.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in most aspects 4 to >0 pts Completely unsatisfactory 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeC7: Evaluates if the topic was discussed completely or were there gaps that were identifiable. 10 to >9.0 pts Meets the criterion 9 to >8.0 pts Falls slightly short of the criterion 8 to >6.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in some aspects 6 to >4.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in most aspects 4 to >0 pts Completely unsatisfactory 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeC8: Includes a conclusion that summarizes the paper and explains how the main points were integrated and analyzed. 20 to >18.0 pts Meets the criterion 18 to >16.0 pts Falls slightly short of the criterion 16 to >12.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in some aspects Falls short of the criterion in some aspects 12 to >6.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in most aspects 6 to >0 pts Completely unsatisfactory 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContains formatting and conversions that follow the 2009 Publication manual for the APA (6th ed.). APA format includes: F1. An appropriate title page and table of contents 2 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeF2. No bold typeface (exception is Headings) 2 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeF3. Correct format for page header – .5” from top margin 2 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeF4. Correct font and size (Times Roman 12p) 2 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeF5. One inch margins – top, bottom, right; 1” - 1.5” - left 2 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeF6. Organized by appropriate levels of headings 2 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeF7. First line of paragraphs indented consistently 2 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeF8. Entire paper double spaced and no white space between sections. 2 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeF9. Correct format for direct quotations with less than 40 words 2 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeF10: Correct format for direct quotations with more than 40 words 2 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeF11. Direct quotations include page(s) number (p. or pp.) 2 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeF12. Paraphrased material must be cited using the author(s) last name(s) and year of publication enclosed in parentheses 2 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeF13. Avoiding contractions, sexist, biased, or pejorative language; spell out numbers 1-10 2 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeF14. Avoiding use of first or second person 2 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeF15. All references are appropriately spaced with hanging indent 2 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLanguage: ML1. Includes use of words that are precise; jargon and slang are avoided and includes five or less misspelled words, five or less, proper capitalization. 10 to >9.0 pts Meets the criterion 9 to >8.0 pts Falls slightly short of the criterion in some aspects 8 to >6.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in some aspects 6 to >4.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in most aspects 4 to >0 pts Completely unsatisfactory 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeML2. Includes excellent sentence structure, grammar, and diction. 10 to >9.0 pts Meets the criterion 9 to >8.0 pts Falls slightly short of the criterion in some aspects 8 to >6.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in some aspects 6 to >4.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in most aspects 4 to >0 pts Completely unsatisfactory 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeML3. Includes paragraphs that have one clearly identified topic sentence. 10 to >9.0 pts Meets the criterion 9 to >8.0 pts Falls slightly short of the criterion in some aspects 8 to >6.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in some aspects 6 to >4.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in most aspects 4 to >0 pts Completely unsatisfactory 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeML4. Includes paragraph support and expands topic sentences, and is structured logically & clearly. 10 to >9.0 pts Meets the criterion 9 to >8.0 pts Falls slightly short of the criterion in some aspects 8 to >6.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in some aspects 6 to >4.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in most aspects 4 to >0 pts Completely unsatisfactory 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(Content) Demonstrates the ability to organize and integrate the discussion (all ideas in the paper flow logically, appropriate transition within and between paragraphs) 10 to >9.0 pts Meets the criterion 9 to >8.0 pts Falls slightly short of the criterion 8 to >6.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in some aspects 6 to >4.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in most aspects 4 to >0 pts Completely unsatisfactory 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(Content) C10: The references are cited correctly in APA style in text and correspond to the APA formatted reference page. 10 to >9.0 pts Meets the criterion 9 to >8.0 pts Falls slightly short of the criterion 8 to >6.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in some aspects 6 to >4.0 pts Falls short of the criterion in most aspects 4 to >0 pts Completely unsatisfactory 10 pts Total Points: 230

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

Abstract The title of the book chosen for a book review is "Leading change" contributed by Kotter, (2012). This model is very effective for leaders who want to get ahead of conventional leadership patterns of past centuries and deal with current challenges like that of the global pandemic ie covid 19 and prepare themselves to deal with abrupt conditions and volatility (for example). By following the right essential steps, leaders can implement organizational changes effectively. The model was developed by John P Kotter who is a professor at Harvard Business School.